As a guest on GoreForum.com you are free to browse both the main site and some forums. However, by taking just a couple of minutes to register with GoreForum.com you will get to view and comment on all videos on the main site, post in discussion within the the forum, create discussion groups, create photo albums, use our chat and be a part of an amazing online community. ++Registration is quick, simple and free!!!

Conspiracy the best way to win this racial war

CreepyPorn.com
Conspiracy

Conspiracy the best way to win this racial war

vomitbrain66

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
2,546
Gorecoins
300
well, we all know we're in a race war. Jews are attacking by influencing race mixing and genetically killing white European people. the world is blending more and more, it will never stop until there are no more whites in the world. So, the best way to reverse our current situation and win this war is to make them take their own poison, we have to reproduce among ourselves, having children is our best strategy against non-whites. we need to play their game and beat them at their own game. killing blacks and Muslims doesn't change anything; you kill 1,000, another 10,000 are born. we have to have more and more children! we have to encourage whites to reproduce among themselves!
 

Remor

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
380
Gorecoins
36
well, we all know we're in a race war. Jews are attacking by influencing race mixing and genetically killing white European people. the world is blending more and more, it will never stop until there are no more whites in the world. So, the best way to reverse our current situation and win this war is to make them take their own poison, we have to reproduce among ourselves, having children is our best strategy against non-whites. we need to play their game and beat them at their own game. killing blacks and Muslims doesn't change anything; you kill 1,000, another 10,000 are born. we have to have more and more children! we have to encourage whites to reproduce among themselves!
If the gene pool in an individual far exceeds that of another individual, he or she will be born with the highest genetic load.

The way to maintain the race is to selectively choose a mate so that individuals will gradually become white almost regardless of race.

The best example of this is the whites, before 23000 BC the Europeans were of a brown color, it was not due to invasions from central Asia in 12000 BC that they brought to the continent the genes for white skin, and due to evolutionary pressure due to low sunlight in Europe the white gene win in Europe and lost in central Asia.

 

vomitbrain66

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
2,546
Gorecoins
300
If the gene pool in an individual far exceeds that of another individual, he or she will be born with the highest genetic load.

The way to maintain the race is to selectively choose a mate so that individuals will gradually become white almost regardless of race.

The best example of this is the whites, before 23000 BC the Europeans were of a brown color, it was not due to invasions from central Asia in 12000 BC that they brought to the continent the genes for white skin, and due to evolutionary pressure due to low sunlight in Europe the white gene win in Europe and lost in central Asia.

sources: jew made site on surface web
 

RoadsideHorror

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
2,091
Gorecoins
180
If the gene pool in an individual far exceeds that of another individual, he or she will be born with the highest genetic load.

The way to maintain the race is to selectively choose a mate so that individuals will gradually become white almost regardless of race.

The best example of this is the whites, before 23000 BC the Europeans were of a brown color, it was not due to invasions from central Asia in 12000 BC that they brought to the continent the genes for white skin, and due to evolutionary pressure due to low sunlight in Europe the white gene win in Europe and lost in central Asia.

That theory is premised on "the out of Africa theory", where they allege mankind came out of Central Africa, up towards the Sahara Desert, crossed the Sahara Desert, crossed the Red Sea, & migrated throughout the Earth. The tribe of people who did this "became" all the people on Earth today. The reason this didn't happen is because it's an impossible task for any human to do.

This map represents the path that this tribe took 60 000 years ago. It's easy to paint arrows on maps, but actually doing a trip like what these arrows represent just didn't happen:
The-origin-of-anatomically-modern-humans-Homo-sapiens-and-migration-out-of-Africa.png


National Geographic made a documentary about humans migrating throughout the Earth:

Supposedly this occurred 60,000 years ago, which we know didn't happen because human 60,000 years ago didn't have the technology to do the job that this map represents. They didn't have compasses, navigational skills or maps. They would of had no idea where they were going. If they tried to cross an ocean, they would've had no idea that some island was out there or a continent like Australia. So crossing 100s of miles of ocean & hoping something was there is just impossible.

Spencer Wells agrees (around the 6:00 mark of the NatGeo documentary) that this migration was impossible.

1635198394092.png
These are the sand bushman, a tribe of Central Africans. Using DNA testing Spencer Wells thinks he proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that a portion of this tribe broke off then ventured north out of Africa then ended up populating the entire world. Meaning, they turned into everybody on Earth including you & me.

The absurdity of this notion is that this particular part of the tribe stayed right where they were for 60,000 years. They never migrated at all so why would a section of them break off & migrate all over the Earth? That's just completely ridiculous.

Further, this tribe had no compasses, no knowledge of navigation, no maps & no idea of where they were going, so why would they do something so stupid? This tribe lives mostly barefoot & naked, does it look like they could survive the incredibly harsh environments they would need to to migrate throughout the entire Earth? I don't think so.

The scientific story goes that the sand bushman migrated throughout Africa. To give yourself an idea of how difficult that would be, put a map of the United States in Africa to see how immense Africa is.

They could not possibly go in a straight line like the map shows up to the Red Sea:
1635199295515.png
 

88stpetersburg

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
2,125
Gorecoins
219
That theory is premised on "the out of Africa theory", where they allege mankind came out of Central Africa, up towards the Sahara Desert, crossed the Sahara Desert, crossed the Red Sea, & migrated throughout the Earth. The tribe of people who did this "became" all the people on Earth today. The reason this didn't happen is because it's an impossible task for any human to do.

This map represents the path that this tribe took 60 000 years ago. It's easy to paint arrows on maps, but actually doing a trip like what these arrows represent just didn't happen:
View attachment 39202

National Geographic made a documentary about humans migrating throughout the Earth:

Supposedly this occurred 60,000 years ago, which we know didn't happen because human 60,000 years ago didn't have the technology to do the job that this map represents. They didn't have compasses, navigational skills or maps. They would of had no idea where they were going. If they tried to cross an ocean, they would've had no idea that some island was out there or a continent like Australia. So crossing 100s of miles of ocean & hoping something was there is just impossible.

Spencer Wells agrees (around the 6:00 mark of the NatGeo documentary) that this migration was impossible.

View attachment 39203 These are the sand bushman, a tribe of Central Africans. Using DNA testing Spencer Wells thinks he proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that a portion of this tribe broke off then ventured north out of Africa then ended up populating the entire world. Meaning, they turned into everybody on Earth including you & me.

The absurdity of this notion is that this particular part of the tribe stayed right where they were for 60,000 years. They never migrated at all so why would a section of them break off & migrate all over the Earth? That's just completely ridiculous.

Further, this tribe had no compasses, no knowledge of navigation, no maps & no idea of where they were going, so why would they do something so stupid? This tribe lives mostly barefoot & naked, does it look like they could survive the incredibly harsh environments they would need to to migrate throughout the entire Earth? I don't think so.

The scientific story goes that the sand bushman migrated throughout Africa. To give yourself an idea of how difficult that would be, put a map of the United States in Africa to see how immense Africa is.

They could not possibly go in a straight line like the map shows up to the Red Sea:
View attachment 39204
something very wrong with this. we might be from africa but are we all niggers back then? no.. niggers are bestiality of whore fucking an ape 40K years ago. look at their chin,cheeks and iq. not really much different than ape (except the iq, nigger = 65 an actual ape = 79) now, do you know austronesian? the people with yellow skin, are they darkies subhuman niggers? (they original from madagascar)
 

Remor

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
380
Gorecoins
36
That theory is premised on "the out of Africa theory", where they allege mankind came out of Central Africa, up towards the Sahara Desert, crossed the Sahara Desert, crossed the Red Sea, & migrated throughout the Earth. The tribe of people who did this "became" all the people on Earth today. The reason this didn't happen is because it's an impossible task for any human to do.

This map represents the path that this tribe took 60 000 years ago. It's easy to paint arrows on maps, but actually doing a trip like what these arrows represent just didn't happen:
View attachment 39202

National Geographic made a documentary about humans migrating throughout the Earth:

Supposedly this occurred 60,000 years ago, which we know didn't happen because human 60,000 years ago didn't have the technology to do the job that this map represents. They didn't have compasses, navigational skills or maps. They would of had no idea where they were going. If they tried to cross an ocean, they would've had no idea that some island was out there or a continent like Australia. So crossing 100s of miles of ocean & hoping something was there is just impossible.

Spencer Wells agrees (around the 6:00 mark of the NatGeo documentary) that this migration was impossible.

View attachment 39203 These are the sand bushman, a tribe of Central Africans. Using DNA testing Spencer Wells thinks he proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that a portion of this tribe broke off then ventured north out of Africa then ended up populating the entire world. Meaning, they turned into everybody on Earth including you & me.

The absurdity of this notion is that this particular part of the tribe stayed right where they were for 60,000 years. They never migrated at all so why would a section of them break off & migrate all over the Earth? That's just completely ridiculous.

Further, this tribe had no compasses, no knowledge of navigation, no maps & no idea of where they were going, so why would they do something so stupid? This tribe lives mostly barefoot & naked, does it look like they could survive the incredibly harsh environments they would need to to migrate throughout the entire Earth? I don't think so.

The scientific story goes that the sand bushman migrated throughout Africa. To give yourself an idea of how difficult that would be, put a map of the United States in Africa to see how immense Africa is.

They could not possibly go in a straight line like the map shows up to the Red Sea:
View attachment 39204
First: I will answer your questions separately.

Second: Do you speak English?



1- Primitive humans do not need maps and compasses, they moved when their environment changed and thus they lack food resources, the world changed a lot in the glaciation of the ice age.

The Sahara at that time was a river forest.

2-Primitive humans did not cross the oceans, at that time the water level was lower than today, so America joined with Russia by the natural bridge (Bering Strait) currently submerged

3-Humans of that time do not exist today, we know of their existence from fociles and genetics remain in our blood.

But those humans who spread throughout the world mixed with Denisobians, Neanderthals, Cro-Magnons, etc.
 

88stpetersburg

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
2,125
Gorecoins
219
That theory is premised on "the out of Africa theory", where they allege mankind came out of Central Africa, up towards the Sahara Desert, crossed the Sahara Desert, crossed the Red Sea, & migrated throughout the Earth. The tribe of people who did this "became" all the people on Earth today. The reason this didn't happen is because it's an impossible task for any human to do.

This map represents the path that this tribe took 60 000 years ago. It's easy to paint arrows on maps, but actually doing a trip like what these arrows represent just didn't happen:
View attachment 39202

National Geographic made a documentary about humans migrating throughout the Earth:

Supposedly this occurred 60,000 years ago, which we know didn't happen because human 60,000 years ago didn't have the technology to do the job that this map represents. They didn't have compasses, navigational skills or maps. They would of had no idea where they were going. If they tried to cross an ocean, they would've had no idea that some island was out there or a continent like Australia. So crossing 100s of miles of ocean & hoping something was there is just impossible.

Spencer Wells agrees (around the 6:00 mark of the NatGeo documentary) that this migration was impossible.

View attachment 39203 These are the sand bushman, a tribe of Central Africans. Using DNA testing Spencer Wells thinks he proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that a portion of this tribe broke off then ventured north out of Africa then ended up populating the entire world. Meaning, they turned into everybody on Earth including you & me.

The absurdity of this notion is that this particular part of the tribe stayed right where they were for 60,000 years. They never migrated at all so why would a section of them break off & migrate all over the Earth? That's just completely ridiculous.

Further, this tribe had no compasses, no knowledge of navigation, no maps & no idea of where they were going, so why would they do something so stupid? This tribe lives mostly barefoot & naked, does it look like they could survive the incredibly harsh environments they would need to to migrate throughout the entire Earth? I don't think so.

The scientific story goes that the sand bushman migrated throughout Africa. To give yourself an idea of how difficult that would be, put a map of the United States in Africa to see how immense Africa is.

They could not possibly go in a straight line like the map shows up to the Red Sea:
View attachment 39204
you don't even mention we white are indo-european not moor
 

Remor

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
380
Gorecoins
36
something very wrong with this. we might be from africa but are we all niggers back then? no.. niggers are bestiality of whore fucking an ape 40K years ago. look at their chin,cheeks and iq. not really much different than ape (except the iq, nigger = 65 an actual ape = 79) now, do you know austronesian? the people with yellow skin, are they darkies subhuman niggers? (they original from madagascar)
The humans who lived in Africa 60,000 years ago were not the blacks who now live in the region.
Yes, all humans come from Africa, but we do not disengage from blacks.
 

Remor

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
380
Gorecoins
36
i think i understand your point. i just want to save the heritage of my people
I know, but that does not make it less truthful, we Europeans dominate the world, it is only a matter of time for the others to collapse and continue on our way.

In evolution only the most act supersedes and the weak dies.
 

Remor

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
380
Gorecoins
36
something very wrong with this. we might be from africa but are we all niggers back then? no.. niggers are bestiality of whore fucking an ape 40K years ago. look at their chin,cheeks and iq. not really much different than ape (except the iq, nigger = 65 an actual ape = 79) now, do you know austronesian? the people with yellow skin, are they darkies subhuman niggers? (they original from madagascar)
The IQ of a ape is 40, not 79.
 

RoadsideHorror

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
2,091
Gorecoins
180
First: I will answer your questions separately.

Second: Do you speak English?



1- Primitive humans do not need maps and compasses, they moved when their environment changed and thus they lack food resources, the world changed a lot in the glaciation of the ice age.

The Sahara at that time was a river forest.

2-Primitive humans did not cross the oceans, at that time the water level was lower than today, so America joined with Russia by the natural bridge (Bering Strait) currently submerged

3-Humans of that time do not exist today, we know of their existence from fociles and genetics remain in our blood.

But those humans who spread throughout the world mixed with Denisobians, Neanderthals, Cro-Magnons, etc.
1. You might want to ask yourself why the only San Tribesmen today live in southern Africa. If they had 60,000 years to trek, and they did zero trekking, doesn't that make you wonder why they would migrate 60,000 years ago when there was no possible way to cross oceans, deserts, mountains...?

According to you, the desert was a river forest then hundreds of thousands of cubic miles of sand came floating in making the Sahara and Arabian deserts. If you believe that, you're gullible.

2. How convenient for their impossible journey that the oceans didn't exist back then. Utter nonsense, these fables get more ridiculous the more it goes on.

3. Even if you are correct that mankind could have made such a journey tens of thousands of years ago, you still need to explain the fact that Asia circa 1500 was composed of 100% Asians, with Asian languages and alphabets that are completely isolated in Asia. Europeans were completely isolated in Europe with European languages, completely separate from African and Asian languages. If you think Africans turned into Asians by hiking to Asia, and into Europeans by hiking to Europe, whilst zero Europeans and Asians evolved in Africa... The obvious evidence shows it didn't happen.

More absurd fables. I've already went over this on the forum before but I'll just show you a Neanderthal skull & refer back to my observations on another ape skull used for fraud in another thread:

1635230169042.png

 

RoadsideHorror

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
2,091
Gorecoins
180
something very wrong with this. we might be from africa but are we all niggers back then? no.. niggers are bestiality of whore fucking an ape 40K years ago. look at their chin,cheeks and iq. not really much different than ape (except the iq, nigger = 65 an actual ape = 79) now, do you know austronesian? the people with yellow skin, are they darkies subhuman niggers? (they original from madagascar)
What's wrong is the point went way over your hollow head. The whole point of the comment was to showcase why we didn't migrate out of Africa & somehow that wasn't clear enough to you.
you don't even mention we white are indo-european not moor
I didn't mention "Indo-Europeans" because it's outside the parameter of the discussion, retard.
 

88stpetersburg

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
2,125
Gorecoins
219
What's wrong is the point went way over your hollow head. The whole point of the comment was to showcase why we didn't migrate out of Africa & somehow that wasn't clear enough to you.

I didn't mention "Indo-Europeans" because it's outside the parameter of the discussion, retard.
so why you shown an fake history of everyone migrate from africa? shit is dumb you even have tought we white are african niggers because we "from africa"? lol we white are indo european.
 

88stpetersburg

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
2,125
Gorecoins
219
What's wrong is the point went way over your hollow head. The whole point of the comment was to showcase why we didn't migrate out of Africa & somehow that wasn't clear enough to you.

I didn't mention "Indo-Europeans" because it's outside the parameter of the discussion, retard.
fuck that kikes tube links too. false information
 

RoadsideHorror

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
2,091
Gorecoins
180
so why you shown an fake history of everyone migrate from africa? shit is dumb you even have tought we white are african niggers because we "from africa"? lol we white are indo european.
Your illiteracy prevented you from seeing the reason why I mentioned the theory. Even if you could read/write sufficiently, you lack the intelligence to comprehend what you are reading. Take a back seat on this one, you're out of your element here.
 

88stpetersburg

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
2,125
Gorecoins
219
Your illiteracy prevented you from seeing the reason why I mentioned the theory. Even if you could read/write sufficiently, you lack the intelligence to comprehend what you are reading. Take a back seat on this one, you're out of your element here.
lol ok. keep believe in equality, one day you'll see when the jews turn their back against you
 

Remor

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
380
Gorecoins
36
1. You might want to ask yourself why the only San Tribesmen today live in southern Africa. If they had 60,000 years to trek, and they did zero trekking, doesn't that make you wonder why they would migrate 60,000 years ago when there was no possible way to cross oceans, deserts, mountains...?

According to you, the desert was a river forest then hundreds of thousands of cubic miles of sand came floating in making the Sahara and Arabian deserts. If you believe that, you're gullible.

2. How convenient for their impossible journey that the oceans didn't exist back then. Utter nonsense, these fables get more ridiculous the more it goes on.

3. Even if you are correct that mankind could have made such a journey tens of thousands of years ago, you still need to explain the fact that Asia circa 1500 was composed of 100% Asians, with Asian languages and alphabets that are completely isolated in Asia. Europeans were completely isolated in Europe with European languages, completely separate from African and Asian languages. If you think Africans turned into Asians by hiking to Asia, and into Europeans by hiking to Europe, whilst zero Europeans and Asians evolved in Africa... The obvious evidence shows it didn't happen.

More absurd fables. I've already went over this on the forum before but I'll just show you a Neanderthal skull & refer back to my observations on another ape skull used for fraud in another thread:

View attachment 39216
1-Do you know that sand is created when the stone was dislodged by water and time?

2-The primitive languages had a language almost like non-gesticulated moans, their language so simple evolved to the rest of languages when isolating itself from the others.

3-The sam did not exist at that time, no ethnic group, tribe or current race existed at that time, only anatomically primitive humans and other human species such as Neanderthals existed.

4-Before the sea level was up to 20 meters lower due to the glaciers that held back the water. There were "natural bridges" that do not exist like the Bering Strait, at that time it connected Russia with Alaska.

5-They did not make any trips, being nomads they moved following the resources, the mountains can surround the deserts, they can follow the rivers.
You underestimate the will to live of beings that were more animals than humans.

This is what the Bering Strait looks like today and what it was like 15,000 years ago.

1635313213378.jpeg
 

RoadsideHorror

Killer
Love Gore
Gore Vicious
LV
0
 
Credits
2,091
Gorecoins
180
1-Do you know that sand is created when the stone was dislodged by water and time?

2-The primitive languages had a language almost like non-gesticulated moans, their language so simple evolved to the rest of languages when isolating itself from the others.

3-The sam did not exist at that time, no ethnic group, tribe or current race existed at that time, only anatomically primitive humans and other human species such as Neanderthals existed.

4-Before the sea level was up to 20 meters lower due to the glaciers that held back the water. There were "natural bridges" that do not exist like the Bering Strait, at that time it connected Russia with Alaska.

5-They did not make any trips, being nomads they moved following the resources, the mountains can surround the deserts, they can follow the rivers.
You underestimate the will to live of beings that were more animals than humans.

This is what the Bering Strait looks like today and what it was like 15,000 years ago.

View attachment 39227
Let's pretend the tribesman were really lucky & they were somehow able to go straight North to the Red Sea without compasses etc. 1st they would've had to trek hundreds of miles North to the edge of the Sahara Desert. Crossing the Sahara Desert with no food, no water & no clothing for protection.

Crossing Ethiopia would've been no easier. They would have to cross an area called Afar, it's 87 degrees average. The water is salt water, it's not drinkable. No matter which way they went north, through the Sahara or through Ethiopia they all would've died or gotten lost.

But let's play pretend that they made it all the way to the Red Sea. The Red Sea is 20 to 100 miles across. So how did they cross the Red Sea? Did they swim? Did they use boats? Somehow they got across the Red Sea, we don't know how.

At some point around the Red Sea, a group of the tribesman broke off to become all the worlds Jews & Arabs. 100% of the remnants became Jews & Arabs because there is no remnant of the bushman whatsoever.

Now they have to cross the Arabian Desert, an even more deadly desert than the Sahara Desert in many ways. The Arabian desert has the largest area of just pure sand than any other desert in the world. Would've ended up dead.

Let's continue with this pretend journey. Next they had to cross the Persian Gulf 60 to 210 miles across, much farther than the Red Sea. Same problem as the Red Sea, how did they get across? We don't know.

Next they had to trek 2,500 miles through Pakistan, India, Bangladesh into South East Asia. The reality is they would've been travelling in circles & gotten lost like they would with any great land mass without any navigational equipment. Their best shot at success would've been travelling around the coastline of India, but that would be a trip of about 4,500 miles. Impossible.

At some point in this trek, the bushmen (or whatever they were at this time) split off with the group, remained in India & turned into Indians. What's truly amazing is 100% of them did, there was no remnant whatsoever of the original bushmen.

Next the tribe of bushmen had to travel from the east coast India to the East coast of Vietnam. If they went on a very direct route, it would be about another 2,500 miles. But a naked barefoot tribe with absolutely no navigational tools or skills would've been spent 1000s of years going around in circles & finally die.

Some of the Tribesman broke off with the group & remained in Asia. These people turned into 100% of the Asians, not a single tribes member was left to prove this incredible transformation.

Another part of the tribe broke off because they decided they wanted to go to Australia. This group crossed the South China Sea which is 600 miles, trekked across Borneo which is 400 miles then they crossed Java & Timor seas which is a 1000 miles. Again, we'll just have to use our imaginations on how they did this.

40,000 years ago the tribe (or whatever was left of them, or whatever they were at the time) entered Europe through Southeast Asia then turned into Caucasians. Europe was 100% Caucasian & again there was no remnant whatsoever left of the tribe that supposedly led to the formation of Caucasians.

Next the tribe (or whatever was left of them, or whatever they were at the time) migrated 5,500 miles up the east coast to a land bridge between North America & Asia. So 15,000 years ago they entered North America, South America & they turned into Incas, Aztecs & American Indians. So these Sand Tribesman turned into those people.

So what does all this prove about the map with arrows? It proves that maps are real easy to draw with arrows on them. It also proves that a tribe from Africa didn't leave Africa and inhabit the entire Earth.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment
Registering at Goreforum is quicker and more easier than ever and and you will have access to other areas of the forum. What are you waiting for?

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Private conversations
Rules Help Users
    You haven't joined any rooms.

    Someone ever said

    "Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever." (Mahatma Gandhi)

    GoreForum

    International law holds that freedom of expression is protected in all forums, including Forums online based within the World Wide Web.
    Top